The Truth is Impossible to Hide

You guys know I don’t usually forward stuff or link blog crap… And definitely not The Blaze… Ugh…

But, this one makes a solid point, and won’t get any attention in the press.

The overwhelming majority of Muslim Peoples currently in the USA do very much agree with, and support, Jihad: the murder of all who disagree with them.

Why do you think the Liberals/Democrats like Jihadis so much? In spite of their desire to kill one of the Democrats’ pet demographics, gays? Because, to a Democrat, slaughtering all who disagree is a much more important ideal than the possible alienation of one of their pet sucker groups. Both Muslims and Democrats have the same root; hate and arrogance of such extreme that they openly declare that murdering all who disagree with them is a good thing. If some gays get caught in the mess, their keepers don’t care! Gays are just suckers to be stepped on to get to Genocide; the Democrats’ real objective.

You thought the Westboro Baptist people were bad? Really? Anyone with an IQ above 60 can see that the Westboro gig is a false-flag/psyop…

Radicalization. A term I’ve seen thrown about lately that just makes me sad for humanity. “Being radicalized” is not a thing that “happens” or “is done” to you. It’s not even a real concept or quality. So-called “radicalization” is merely the choice to kill people that disagree with you. Read through the comments left by anti-gunners on anything pro-gun. They call gun-owners violent, stupid, intollerant, inbred, etc… But, it’s the anti-gunners that are publicly calling for the murder of anyone who owns a gun! Assassinations are almost always the act of the left/socialist/democrat/marxist bent, no matter which name they’re trying to hide behind at the moment. The depth of lie in the use of the phrase “radicalization” is a thing that surprises me, even though the depths to which liars will sink really shouldn’t surprise me anymore…

But, anyway… The bottom line is that Jihadis and Democrats are pretty much the same thing, and it’s really, really, really easy to see…

We’ve been asking “real Muslims” to stand up and tell the “radicals” to back off, well. One finally did.

And this is what happened to him.

The peaceful branch? The fact that one even need specify a distinction should tell a person with a brain all they need to know…

The Blaze makes it a bit hard to sort out. This man was asked to resign, not because of anything he said about Trump, but because refusing to support Jihad makes him “not a real Muslim.” This is why there are so few “moderate” or “peaceful” Muslims. The only reason he’s even alive is because he’s in the public eye. Otherwise, he’d be stoned to death as an Infidel.

Much in the way Partick Henry made clear to us. This war is not one of our choosing. The clanking of the chains can be heard. The delusive Phantom of Hope (and appeasement) will not save you. They are bringing the war to us. We don’t get to decide not to participate. They want to kill us, and they very much are the overwhelming majority of the Muslim Religion. They have proven it. Again and again. Wake up you stupid fuckers!

I still prefer Cruz over Trump. Trump is an immature overreaction, but a broken clock is still right twice a day…

Much like the microcosm of self-defense, this is the macrocosm of the same. I’m more than aware of the slippery slope of de-humanizing the enemy. Justifying the same slaughter they would bring… They’re the ones who decided to read and believe in a book that says “It’s us or them, get 72 virgins for making it us.” Seriously, humping virgins is your supposedly “religious” motivation? How fucked up can ya get? Is it not obvious that this is designed to motivate stupid animalistic pseudo-men to perform mass murder on behalf of… Whatever? Much like a rapist that is certain to kill his victim so she doesn’t blab. We don’t get to chose if there is going to be a slaughter. We only get to chose who walks away. And, again, just like self-defense, the choice is not really us or them. The choice is “which of these is the world better off without?” A rapist, emboldened by success, to repeat and inflict it again and again? OR a woman with a smoking gun, whole, alive, and intact, and a dead would-be rapist, no longer able to ply his trade upon her or others? Which one makes the world a better place?

Jihad is not a choice in participation. All we get to decide is what’s left over when it’s finished… And we really must finish this bullshit. The multiple ironies of the ubiquitous “participation award” becomes ever more salient…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *